He went on to say that he hopes people can learn from the ordeal. "It's dangerous and what I mean by it's dangerous is that it's dangerous not just for our democracy, but for all of those election officials down there - Democrats and Republicans - whose lives are being threatened every day because they're volunteering their own efforts. I hope people learn from it so that it doesn't happen again," he said. something the previous president claimed and everyone else jumped on board. Ben Ray Luján (D-NM) told Raw Story that he began hearing lies about Georgia from the very early days of the 2020 election. IN OTHER NEWS: He bought a gun for Kyle Rittenhouse - now he’s headed to jail after a tearful apology He infamously told "60 Minutes" in late Nov. So, again, what you're seeing is when you continue to see these election deniers that are being put up for office, even in areas that are red, Americans aren't buying it."ĬISA stands for Former United States Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. The 2020 election was the fairest, most open, transparent -and I'm paraphrasing it - election in American history. "Again, I go back to what President Trump's own then-head of CISA, Chris Krebs said. Mark Warner (D-VA) when Raw Story asked him about the report's findings. "For most rational Americans that's not breaking news," said Sen. See his discussion with Wallace, Suzanne Craig and Barbara McQuade below or at the link here. Cohen is going to court over the request for the information. Thus far the government has refused to give up the information, even under President Joe Biden's administration. He's been engaged in an ongoing effort to obtain the documents around the ordeal, as well as the Bureau of Prisons, attempting to prevent him from publishing a book. The information came after Cohen continued his attacks on the Southern District of New York for the Justice Department's attempts to silence him from revealing details about Trump. And tomorrow, fortunately, I'm seeing another lawyer in order to determine whether or not I'm going to make a motion to quash the subpoena and basically show Donald the same consideration he showed to the American people." "Clearly, the information I'm providing is predicated on documentation, you know, on documentary evidence, and as much as they think they're going to bully me, it's not going to happen. "It's one of the dumbest moves I could possibly imagine they would want," said Cohen. IN OTHER NEWS: Pennsylvania governor shreds Norfolk Southern for 'giving the middle finger' to regular people He confessed he had no idea why, and that there were several law firms listed, everyone from the typical names like Alina Habba and more. It's like five or six of them are subpoenaing me to come in a couple of weeks and provide a deposition." Well, after reading the document the first few pages I realized it's actually not from the attorney general but rather it's from Trump's lawyers. Why would the attorney general ask for me or why would they subpoena me? All you have to do is call and ask me and I'd be happy to come in and provide any testimony that they want. "And I'm saying to myself, my God, this is so weird. It's a subpoena to testify," Cohen revealed. See the full 12-page filing here and read the full report on the case at the Arizona Republic. “And some of our attorneys said, ‘Look, I got mouths to feed, I can’t do this case, I don’t want to be sanctioned.’” “We had attorneys who did walk away because the left is threatening them with their ability to make a living and practice law,” Lake said. Lake lamented in December that she had a rough time trying to find a lawyer for her suits. One of those lawyers is former Donald Trump attorney Alan Dershowitz. The move comes after Lake's lawyers were hit with Bar Association complaints for lending legal legitimacy to such an effort. RELATED: 'It’s an insult': Arizona's governor vetoes the GOP’s ‘do-nothing’ budget proposal At one point, Thompson made it clear to Lake that he couldn't "accept speculation or conjecture in place of clear and convincing evidence." In the Maricopa County Superior Court, there were two days of testimony in Dec. "Lake’s arguments highlight Election Day difficulties, but her request for relief fails because the evidence presented to the superior court ultimately supports the court’s conclusion that voters were able to cast their ballots, that votes were counted correctly, and that no other basis justifies setting aside the election results," the opinion reads.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |